ArticleScientific reports2025
Inversion and validation of soil water-holding capacity in a wild fruit forest, using hyperspectral technology combined with machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Precise Apple Quality Prediction Model Integrating Driving Factor Screening and BP Neural Network.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil water retention is a critical aspect of water conservation. To quantitatively assess the Soil Water-Holding Capacity (SWHC), this study focused on a typical wild fruit forest in Xinjiang, China. The spectral characteristics of the forest canopy were employed as a bridge to enhance the sensitivity between the SWHC and various vegetation indices using mathematical statistical methods. This study integrated hyperspectral technology with machine learning algorithms to model complex nonlinear relationships and to select the optimal SWHC model. The spatial distribution of SWHC in the wild fruit forests of Emin County was retrieved using Sentinel-2 imagery. The results revealed a significant negative correlation between SWHC and the smoothed leaf spectral reflectance, with the best correlation coefficient was r = - 0.59. The use of third-order derivatives and logarithmic second-order derivatives further enhanced this correlation, yielding optimal coefficients of r = - 0.78 and r = - 0.72, respectively. Moreover, uncertainty analysis demonstrated that the SWHC estimation model constructed using the Random Forest (RF) algorithm exhibited the highest stability, with a coefficient of determination R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.