Observational studyScientific reports2025
Assessment of mandatory declaration excipients in pediatric off label prescriptions in Spain.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Value-based neonatology (VBN): a new ethical paradigm for newborn care.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Prescription of vitamin D in neonates and infants under one year of age in Spain: an eight-year observational study.BMC primary care · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric patients are at increased risk of exposure to potentially harmful excipients when receiving off-label medicinal products primarily formulated for adults, raising concerns about adverse events. Based on data from a previously published study, this research focuses on the most frequently prescribed off-label medicinal products in order to assess the safety of their excipients. The aim was to identify Excipients of Mandatory Declaration (EMDs) that could pose additional safety risks in individuals under the age of 18. A descriptive, and retrospective observational population-based study in individuals under 18 was developed in the Spanish primary care setting between the years 2004-2005 and 2017-2020. The main data source was proprietary database, with nationwide coverage of prescriptions. The analysis included 4,922,984 off-label prescriptions, accounting for 16 active ingredients and 37 medicinal products (18 oral, 16 topical and three inhaled) that were scrutinized for EMD composition. Neonates and infants up to five years old accounted for nearly 50% of all off-label prescriptions among the under-18 population, exposing them to additional safety risks from potentially harmful EMDs in these formulations, which may lead to severe adverse events, causing permanent or long-term harm. The degree of harm of EMDs was assessed overall as "severe" for nine out of 22 EMDs, mostly used for oral formulations, and "moderate" for six EMDs. No EMDs were categorized as "no harm". Results on EMDs in oral medicinal products, for instance, highlight the urgent unmet needs in this regard, especially for young children; EMDs like sodium, sorbitol, propylene glycol and sweeteners often exceeded EMA-recommended thresholds. This study underscores the need to address risks linked to off-label use of medicinal products in children, particularly those related to EMDs. Integrating excipient risk warnings into prescribing systems and monitoring related adverse events is strongly recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.