SynthesisScientific reports2025
Cardiorespiratory fitness after correction of pectus excavatum: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessing the probability of success with vacuum bell therapy in pediatric patients with pectus excavatum: a systematic review and future directions.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Congenital Chest Wall Deformities in Children: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Exercise impairment in patients with pectus excavatum? A scoping review of evidence and role of arterial content change during effort.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Pectus Excavatum-A Frequent but Often Neglected Entity in Sports Cardiology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pectus excavatum or funnel chest is the most prevalent chest wall deformity. Surgical correction is the treatment of choice which is predominantly performed on children and adolescents, often with significant surgical complication rates. While correction is primarily pursued for aesthetic reasons, proponents argue that correction of the inward deformity alleviates compression of the heart, consequently enhancing cardiorespiratory fitness. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess whether surgical correction of pectus excavatum yields improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness, quantified as maximal oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.