ArticleScientific reports2025
An interactive information based DCNN-BiLSTM model with dual attention mechanism for facial expression recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human's facial expressions and emotions have direct impact on their action and decision-making abilities. Basic CNN models are complexity of speeding up the operation to minimize the complexity. In this paper, we have proposed a Deep Convolutional Neural Networks along with Bi-Long Short Term Memory, which is followed by a single and cross-fusion attention mechanism for gathering both spatial and channel information from feature vector maps. Piecewise Cubic Polynomial and linear activation function was used to speed up Interactive Learning Information (ILI). Global Average Pooling (GAP) computes weights for feature vector maps; softmax classifier is used to classify images into 7 classes based on the expression present on the input images. The proposed model's performance was compared with benchmarking methods like NGO-BiLSTM, ICNN-BiLSTM and HCNN-LSTM. The proposed model resulted with better accuracy than other methods with 82.89%, 96.78%, 95.78%, and 95.87% on FER 2013, CK+, RAF-DB and JAFFE datasets and also resulted in lower False Recognition Rate (FAR) of 7.23%, 1.42%, 1.96% and 1.78% on all four datasets respectively. The proposed model has performed well than other benchmarking models with high Genuine Recognition Rate (GAR) of 88.57% on FER2013, 97.23% on CK+, 96.87% on RAF-DB and 96.32% on JAFFE datasets respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.