ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2025
Influence of Multiple Factors on Rhesus Macaque (Macaca mulatta) Use of a Feeding Enrichment Device.
Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We studied the effect of different filler items on rhesus macaques' use of a feeding enrichment device called the 'browsing bowl.' We examined use of the device as affected by calories, sugar content, and volume of different fillers as well as the presentation of each filler as 1) whole, loose, or smeared and 2) frozen or not frozen. In addition, we examined the impact of age and sex of the monkeys on use of the device. Fifty-eight macaques were observed across 30-min sessions with the device, with one session for each of 12 different fillers. Scans occurred every 2.5 min, at which point the monkeys were scored as interacting or not interacting with the device. Subjects were recorded as interacting with the device during 47.6% of all observed scans and during 80% of the first 2 scans per session. Frozen items were associated with a significantly higher mean engagement (ME; proportion of observed scans in which animals engaged with the device) than items that were not frozen items (t(57) = 12.91, P < 0.001). Whole presentations were associated with a significantly higher ME than for smeared (P < 0.001) or loose (P = 0.005) items. Loose items were associated with a significantly higher ME (P < 0.001) than for smeared items. Sugar and calorie content did not impact use of the device. Younger monkeys used the device more than for older monkeys, and female monkeys used the device more than did males. We conclude that some filler items encourage more foraging behavior than others, and that it is possible to generate relatively long (up to 30 min) foraging bouts by altering the presentation of foods rather than increasing calories or sugar content. Indeed, some fillers were still present and engaged with at the end of the observation session.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.