Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40683654›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2025

Using Machine Learning and Predictive Artificial Intelligence to Determine Cage Change Frequency for Mice Housed in Individually Ventilated Cages and Drive Vivarium Operational Efficiency.

Joseph M Collins, Bhupinder Singh, Michael E Zwick, Giorgio Rosati, Mara Rigamonti, Cristian Urdiales, Jeetendra R Eswaraka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Enhancing Rodent Welfare, Cost Savings, and Efficiency: Implementation and Review of Data-Driven Improvements.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joseph M Collins1Rutgers Animal Care Unit, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Bhupinder Singh1Rutgers Animal Care Unit, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Michael E Zwick2Office for Research, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey; and.
Giorgio Rosati3Tecniplast Inc., Buguggiate, Italy.
Mara Rigamonti3Tecniplast Inc., Buguggiate, Italy.
Cristian Urdiales3Tecniplast Inc., Buguggiate, Italy.
Jeetendra R Eswaraka1Rutgers Animal Care Unit, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A standard 2-wk cage change frequency for individually ventilated mouse cages is used in many research facilities, with negligible effects on animal health and welfare. However, these techniques rely on subjective visual evaluations and often require spot changes. In this study, we describe the use and validation of digital monitoring technology to objectively determine the necessity of a cage change for mice. We used a machine learning/artificial intelligence algorithm that was trained by annotating human observations of soiled bedding to correlate with the Bedding Status Index (BSI), a digital measure quantifying bedding 'wetness.' Training of the algorithm was performed using various mouse strains of different age, sex, and cage densities to account for variability of these factors. Through constant user feedback and increased datasets, we were able to identify soiled cages with an accuracy >90% for cages with higher densities (for example, 5 animals per cage), while lower densities exhibited slightly reduced accuracy levels (the lowest accuracy was attributed to single-housed mice, at 76%). Our data show that the average change intervals for most average-sized mice ranged between 3 and 6 wk depending on the number of animals in the cage, which is significantly different from the standard 2-wk change used in our facility. Retired breeders and larger mice tended to have a shorter cage change interval as determined by the algorithm. These results show that the Bedding Status Index, which measures an intracage environmental variable, namely bedding wetness, can be used as a marker for cage change. The extended cage change schedule did not affect intracage ammonia, CO2 levels, mouse growth rates, or circadian rhythm metrics. Using digital alerts to determine the need for a cage change resulted in a 65% to 70% reduction in the number of cage changes needed, indicating that this method can improve operational efficiency by reducing cage changes, cage wash time, staff labor, and resource consumption.

Indexed as

ACH, air changes per hourAI, artificial intelligenceB6, C57BL/6BSI, Bedding Status IndexDVC, Digital Ventilated CageIVC, individually ventilated cageML, machine learningSW, Swiss Webster

Identifiers

PMID40683654
PMCPMC12379621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.