ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2025
Best Practices for Supporting Professional Identity Formation during Laboratory Animal Medicine Residency Training.
Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Professional identity formation (PIF) is the dynamic psychosocial process crucial to becoming enculturated into a profession. This nonlinear process starts with entrance into a training program and ideally results in the harmonization of norms, values, and aspirations of the person with those of the chosen field. PIF is most successful when trainees can reflect, have positive role models and mentors, and receive social validation. Those who experience lack of support or hardship during PIF are at risk of burnout and poor mental health during their careers. Medical education research indicates that residency training significantly impacts PIF. This occurs because residents' new patient care responsibilities force them to grapple with the differences between the ideal practice taught in medical school and the realities of their work lives. Emerging evidence in veterinary medical education research indicates that residents enrolled in laboratory animal medicine (LAM) residency programs experience similar tensions as they navigate relationships with stakeholders, encounter conditional valuation of their veterinary knowledge, and feel powerless to enact changes. To explore best practices for supporting PIF for developing LAM veterinarians, we performed a qualitative analysis of written comments from surveys completed by attendees at the 2022 American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine Forum meeting. Results were organized by 5 themes: (1) empowering residents to step into their authority and understand the limitations of their roles, (2) providing support for learning about the complexities of relationships within LAM, (3) serving as role models and mentors in building relationships, (4) creating opportunities to learn professional communication, and (5) advocating for the specialized and explicit value of the profession (LAM). From these results, we constructed a model that illustrates the PIF process for LAM veterinarians in training, with the goal of raising awareness of the connection between the quality of PIF and career wellness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.