Article in The Lancet. Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Wuwei FengDepartment of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: wayne.feng@duke.edu.
Christy CassarlyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
George F WittenbergDepartments of Neurology, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, and Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Technology Enhancing Cognition and Health-Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center and Human Engineering Research Labs, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Gottfried SchlaugDepartment of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Applied Life Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
Funding
Workshop to Identify Collaborative Project(s) for the NIH StrokeNet and the Japan NEtwork for Clinical Stroke Trials (NECST)U01NS087748 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Catherine R. Dillon, Jordan J. Elm · 2014 to 2026
$14.1M
TRANScranial direct current stimulation for POst-stroke motor Recover - a phase II sTudy (TRANSPORT 2)U01NS102353 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI FENG, WUWEI, SCHLAUG, GOTTFRIED · 2018 to 2023
$8.5M
Duke-University of North Carolina (UNC) Eastern North Carolina and Southern Virginia RegIonal Stroke trIal cONsortium (ENVISION)U24NS135250 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Wuwei Feng, David Yi-Gin Hwang · 2024 to 2026
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Rethinking neuromodulation in stroke: lessons from TRANSPORT2 - Authors' reply. · full record | OpenQuestion