ArticleStructure (London, England : 1993)2025
SeaMoon: From protein language models to continuous structural heterogeneity.
Article in Structure (London, England : 1993), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- PETIMOT: a novel framework for inferring protein motions from sparse data using SE(3)-equivariant graph neural networks.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026Article
- AI-based methods for simulating, sampling, and predicting protein ensembles.Current opinion in structural biology · 2026Review
- Protein Language Models: Applications and Perspectives.Journal of proteome research · 2026Review
- SeaMoon: From protein language models to continuous structural heterogeneity.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How proteins move and deform determines their interactions with the environment and is thus of the utmost importance for cellular functioning. Following the revolution in single protein 3D structure prediction, researchers have focused on repurposing or developing deep learning models for sampling alternative protein conformations. In this work, we explored whether continuous compact representations of protein motions could be predicted directly from sequences, without exploiting 3D structures. SeaMoon leverages protein language model (pLM) embeddings as input to a lightweight convolutional neural network. We assessed SeaMoon against ∼1,000 collections of experimental conformations exhibiting diverse motions. It predicts at least one ground-truth motion with reasonable accuracy for 40% of the test proteins. SeaMoon captures motions inaccessible to normal mode analysis, an unsupervised physics-based method relying solely on 3D geometry, and generalizes to proteins without detectable sequence similarity to the training set. SeaMoon is easily retrainable with novel or updated pLMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.