ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2025
Safety and feasibility of D3 lymph node dissection in oldest-old patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a multi-institutional, retrospective analysis.
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index Predicts Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in the Oldest-Old With Colorectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of 225 Nonagenarians.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a model for predicting central lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer based on CT textural features and clinical indicators.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- D3 lymph node dissection in right-sided colon cancer: routine requirement or selective application?Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant health burden, with lymph node dissection (LND) playing a critical role in staging and guiding treatment. However, the optimal extent of LND for the oldest-old population (aged ≥ 90 years) remains undefined because of insufficient targeted clinical data. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of D3 versus non-D3 LND in Stage II-III CRC in oldest-old patients.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Setouchi Colorectal Neoplasm Registration database, including 282 oldest-old patients with CRC treated between 2011 and 2022. Patients were stratified into D3 and non-D3 LND groups, with inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment implemented to address potential confounding factors. Postoperative complications and hospital stays were analyzed using regression models and descriptive statistics.
resultsD3 LND resulted in significantly higher lymph node harvests in both Stage II and Stage III patients (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in overall or major postoperative complications between D3 and non-D3 groups. Hospital stays were comparable for Stage II patients but shorter for Stage III patients in the D3 group (p < 0.01). Complication rates ranged from 28% to 47.7%, with surgical site infections and pneumonia being the most common.
conclusionsD3 LND can be safely performed in oldest-old patients with CRC without increasing postoperative complications or extending hospital stays. These findings support the feasibility of extensive LND in this age group, but further studies are needed to evaluate its oncological benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.