Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40682607›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Expert review of CLABSI prevention in the NICU: supporting the transition of investigational drugs into clinical practice.

Paolo Manzoni, David A Kaufman, Victoria Niklas, Mario Giuffrè, Anne-Sylvie Ramelet, Daniele De Luca

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paolo ManzoniUniversity of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Piedmont, Italy. paolomanzoni@hotmail.com.
David A KaufmanUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine and Children's Hospital, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Victoria NiklasOak Hill Bio Ltd, Altrincham, UK.
Mario GiuffrèUniversity of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Anne-Sylvie RameletUniversity of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Daniele De LucaDivision of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "A. Béclère" Medical Center, Paris-Saclay University Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for administering life-saving medications, parenteral nutrition, and fluids in extremely premature (EP; i.e., 28 weeks' gestational age) infants. Indeed, CVCs have enabled increased survival and improved outcomes in EP infants over the last several decades. However, CVCs remain a major risk factor for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), which can lead to serious complications in this vulnerable population. While many neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) have adopted CVC bundles to reduce CLABSI risk, implementation remains inconsistent, contributing to significant variability across centers. A minimized and reproducible baseline rate of CLABSI is important not only to physicians caring for EP infants and their families but also to clinical investigators and regulatory authorities in the evaluation of experimental therapies aimed at combating the complications of prematurity, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, and impaired neurological development. CLABSIs may confound clinical outcomes and thus impact the interpretation of trial results. We propose a standardized central line bundle, informed by current clinical practice and a critical appraisal of the literature, for mandatory use in clinical trials.

conclusionConsistent application of a standardized central line bundle would reduce variability in baseline CLABSI rates across study sites, enabling more accurate benefit-risk assessments of experimental therapies, particularly those requiring central venous access, in this population of infants with a high unmet medical need. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for administering life-saving treatments in extremely premature infants, significantly improving their survival and outcomes. CVCs, however, are known to increase the risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). • Central line bundles are routinely implemented in clinical practice with demonstrable benefit in reducing CLABSI. Still, their impact often wanes as the focus and stringency on bundle components and audit programs decrease. WHAT IS NEW: • We propose a standardized central line bundle for mandatory use in clinical trials. This will help reduce variability in baseline CLABSI rates across study centers, enabling a more accurate evaluation of the benefit-risk profile of experimental therapies-especially those requiring administration via central venous catheters.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCatheter-Related InfectionsCentral Venous CathetersIntensive Care Units, NeonatalHumansInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornRisk FactorsBPDCentral venous catheterCLABSINeonatologySepsis

Identifiers

PMID40682607
PMCPMC12276124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.