ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2025
Alopecia Areata: Impact on Patients' Quality of Life and Disease Perception: A Survey-Based Study.
Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Economic Burden of Alopecia Areata: Evidence from a Survey in Norway and Sweden.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alopecia areata significantly impacts patients' emotional and psychosocial well-being. This survey investigated patients' perspectives on disease severity and its impact on quality of life. The study evaluated whether disease assessment tools (Severity of Alopecia Tool, Dermatology Life Quality Index, and Patient Unique Stigmatization Holistic tool in dermatology) reflect patients' perceptions of their condition. The study was conducted as an anonymous social media survey in Norway and Denmark. The questionnaire was divided into 3 main sections: (i) demographics and disease characteristics; (ii) disease severity and QoL measures; and (iii) patient perception and psychosocial impact. A total of 360 individuals participated in the survey reporting alopecia areata as mild (15%), moderate (29%), or severe (58%). Some 61% reported alopecia areata to interfere with their daily or weekly activities. All disease assessment tools demonstrated an age-dependent pattern, where scores were highest in the youngest (< 30 years) responder group. The relationship between Dermatology Life Quality Index and Severity of Alopecia Tool scores was found to be weak (R-squared = 0.08). Similarly, the correlation between Dermatology Life Quality Index and self-reported disease severity was also weak (R-squared = 0.136). This study demonstrates that there is a clear need for the development of more comprehensive, validated, and patient-centred assessment tools that can accurately reflect the physical, emotional, psychological, and social challenges faced by individuals with alopecia areata.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.