ReviewCurrent opinion in gastroenterology2025
Evolving techniques in the endoscopic evaluation and management of pancreas cystic lesions.
Review in Current opinion in gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewAccurate diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) is essential to guide appropriate management and reduce unnecessary surgeries. Despite multiple guidelines in PCL management, a substantial proportion of patients still undergo major resections for benign cysts, and a majority of resected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) show only low-grade dysplasia, leading to significant clinical, financial, and psychological burdens. This review highlights emerging endoscopic approaches that enhance diagnostic accuracy and support organ-sparing, minimally invasive management of PCLs. RECENT
findingsRecent studies suggest that endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and its accessory techniques, such as contrast-enhanced EUS and needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy, as well as next-generation sequencing analysis of cyst fluid, not only accurately characterize PCLs but are also well tolerated and cost-effective. Additionally, emerging therapeutics such as EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and EUS-chemoablation are promising as minimally invasive treatments for high-risk mucinous PCLs in patients who are not candidates for surgery. SUMMARY: Accurate diagnosis of PCLs remains challenging, leading to many patients undergoing unnecessary surgery. Emerging endoscopic imaging biomarkers, artificial intelligence analysis, and molecular biomarkers enhance diagnostic precision. Additionally, novel endoscopic ablative therapies offer safe, minimally invasive, organ-sparing treatment options, thereby reducing the healthcare resource burdens associated with overtreatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.