ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2025
CRISPR/Cas9 for achieving postintervention HIV control.
Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Beyond Antiretroviral Therapy: Molecular and Immunological Innovations in HIV Treatment.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Review
- World free HIV: the novel therapeutic approaches for eliminating latent HIV infection.Virology journal · 2026Review
- Chimeric antigen receptor T‑cell therapy in chronic viral infections: a review.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Nanoparticles in HIV treatment for improved drug delivery, clinical translation, and future direction.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Searching for a HIV-1 Cure.Theranostics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewRecent advances in gene therapy have led to the first clinically approved CRISPR/Cas9 therapy for β-thalassaemia and sickle cell disease. Gene therapy could play an important role in targeting HIV persistence and achieving postintervention HIV control. Here, we review recent updates in CRISPR/Cas9-based HIV gene therapy approaches, including CCR5-editing (protect), proviral targeting (excise or modify), and immune cell engineering (attack). RECENT
findingsRecent studies provide additional safety data for use of CRISPR/Cas9-based gene therapies, however low in vivo editing efficiency highlights the need for improved delivery methods. This is particularly relevant for strategies requiring transfection of all HIV-infected cells containing intact proviruses, such as proviral excision. For ex vivo editing approaches, poor engraftment and durability of edited cells present additional challenges. Newer methods such as lipid nanoparticle delivery could provide a mechanism to overcome current limitations with ex vivo and in vivo delivery. Several studies have demonstrated proof-of-concept of combination gene therapy approaches, including gene editing strategies to generate HIV-resistant cells with immune effector functions, providing novel approaches to control and durably suppress viral replication. SUMMARY: Several studies have demonstrated feasibility of gene therapy approaches in achieving postintervention HIV control. Improvements in both ex vivo and in vivo delivery methods are required to progress current gene therapy approaches to the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.