ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2025
Determinants of 15-Year Progression-Free Survival in Multiple Myeloma; Real-World Data From a Single Institution.
Article in American journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Efficacy and safety of oral melphalan as conditioning regimen for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Article
- Plasma expression of long non-coding RNAFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis revealed a potential association between ELK3 expression and the progression of multiple myeloma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Lisaftoclax combined with ixazomib and dexamethasone after CAR-T for maintenance therapy in transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory ultra-high-risk multiple myeloma: two case reports and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Determinants of 15-Year Progression-Free Survival in Multiple Myeloma; Real-World Data From a Single Institution.American journal of hematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The therapeutic advances during the last two decades have rendered multiple myeloma a chronic disease and, thus, it is important to identify patient subgroups which may have extremely favorable outcomes and optimize their treatment. The current study aimed to evaluate the clinical and disease characteristics of patients with very long follow-up (minimum 15 years), to identify those with very long survival (> 15 years) and those with very long disease remissions (> 15 years) after frontline treatment diagnosed at a single center from 1994 to 2009. Among 323 consecutive, unselected patients, the calculated 15-year and 20-year cumulative survival rates were 18% and 14%, respectively. Forty-nine survived for more than 15 years. Furthermore, the calculated 15-year and 20-year cumulative PFS rates for the 323 patients were 9% and 7%, respectively; 25 (8%) patients were identified as long-term progression-free survivors. Younger age (≤ 65 years), good performance status (ECOG PS 0-1), low/intermediate risk stratification (ISS 1 or 2), absence of adverse cytogenetic abnormalities, autologous transplantation and achievement of CR to initial therapy were significantly associated with prolonged PFS. Importantly, all patients who were in complete response with negative minimal residual disease at 15 years remained at the same disease status at last follow-up. In conclusion, among patients treated with either conventional chemotherapy or with first-generation novel agents (thalidomide, bortezomib, or lenalidomide), about 15% were long-term survivors and 8% remained in long-term remission for more than 15 years without maintenance treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.