Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40682169›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2025

A power analysis framework to aid the design of robust semi-field vector control experiments.

Andrea M Kipingu, Dickson W Lwetoijera, Kija R Ng'habi, Samson S Kiware, Mafalda Viana, Paul C D Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea M KipinguSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Graham Kerr Building, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK. akipingu@ihi.or.tz.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9063-8651
Dickson W LwetoijeraDepartment of Environmental Health & Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 78 373, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2544-0451
Kija R Ng'habiDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, St. Francis University College of Health and Allied Sciences, P. O. Box 175, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Samson S KiwareDepartment of Environmental Health & Ecological Sciences, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 78 373, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7252-520X
Mafalda Viana *School of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Graham Kerr Building, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5975-6505
Paul C D Johnson *School of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Graham Kerr Building, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK. paul.johnson@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6663-7520

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [INV-016807] 016807European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant agreement no. 852957) 852957Gates Foundation INV-016807Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust through, Training Fellowship in Public Health and Tropical Medicine (091030/Z/09/Z) 091030/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSemi-field experiments are an efficient way of assessing the impacts of potential new vector control tools (VCTs) before field trials. However, their design is critically important to ensure their results are unbiased and informative. An essential element of the design of semi-field experiments is power analysis, which empowers researchers to ensure that only designs with adequate statistical power are adopted. In this study, a methodology was developed, and its use was demonstrated in a tutorial, to determine the required number of semi-field chambers, sampling frequency and the number of mosquitoes required to achieve sufficient power for evaluating the impact of a single VCT or two in combination.

methodsBy analysing data simulated from a generalized linear mixed-effects model, power was estimated for various experimental designs, including short- (24 h) vs. long-term (3 months) experiments and single vs. combined application of interventions (e.g., insecticide-treated nets combined with pyriproxyfen autodissemination).

resultsAlthough power increased with increasing number of chambers, sampling frequency and the number of mosquitoes, the number of chambers and variance between chambers were the dominant factors determining power relative to all other design choices. High variance between chambers decreased power, highlighting the importance of making conditions similar among chambers, by reducing variation if possible and by rotating variables if not. As compared to a single intervention, an additional intervention required an increase in the number of chambers, while short and long experiments were similar in terms of key aspects such as the number of chambers per treatment.

conclusionDetermining the most efficient experimental design for a semi-field experiment will depend on a balance of design choices and resource constraints. The power analysis framework and tutorial provided here can aid in the robust design of these widely used experiments and ultimately facilitate the development of new vector control tools (VCTs).

Indexed as

AnophelesMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsResearch DesignAnimalsExperimental designMalariaMosquitoesSimulation-basedStatistical powerType I error

Identifiers

PMID40682169
PMCPMC12275456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.