ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2025
Collaborative assessment of the risk of postoperative progression in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a robust federated learning model.
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Digital immune twins and ai-integrated multi-omic biomarkers: Redefining personalized immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
- Application of deep learning in prognostic prediction of non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile the TNM staging system provides valuable insights into the extent of disease, predicting postoperative progression in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a significant challenge. An effective bioimaging prognostic marker for early-stage NSCLC, powered by artificial intelligence, could greatly assist clinicians in making informed treatment decisions.
methodsA total of 926 patients from four centers (A, B, C, and D) with histologically confirmed stage I or II solid non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent surgical resection were retrospectively reviewed. In this study, we propose a robust federated learning model (RFed) designed to predict the risk of postoperative progression in early-stage NSCLC patients. The diagnostic efficiency of the RFed model was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). Additionally, the model's performance was further validated through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, with statistical significance assessed using the log-rank test. Finally, the robustness, generalizability, and interpretability of the RFed model were comprehensively evaluated to confirm its clinical applicability.
resultsExperimental results demonstrated the superior performance of the RFed model. Specifically, RFed achieved AUC values of 0.936, 0.861, 0.925, and 0.970 on the test sets from the four centers. DCA further revealed that RFed provided a greater net benefit compared to the clinical model across a threshold probability range of 0.02 to 0.99. Moreover, Kaplan-Meier curves showed improved discrimination between high-risk and low-risk groups when compared to other models, highlighting its enhanced predictive capability.
conclusionsThe RFed model demonstrates significant effectiveness in predicting the risk of postoperative progression in early-stage NSCLC patients. Its clinical application value lies in its potential to enhance stratified management and support the development of precise treatment strategies for this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.