Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40682122›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2025

Daily turnover of airborne bacterial communities in the sub-Antarctic.

Lucie A Malard, Peter Convey, David A Pearce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucie A MalardDepartment F.-A. Forel for Environmental and Aquatic Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland. lucie.malard@unige.ch.
Peter ConveyBritish Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OET, UK.
David A PearceDepartment F.-A. Forel for Environmental and Aquatic Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland. david.pearce@northumbria.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonization of remote ecosystems by new microorganisms poses a significant threat to the diversity and function of native microbial communities. In the polar regions, including Antarctica, airborne microbial communities are shaped by environmental and climatic factors, which are changing rapidly. However, the specific drivers of microbial community composition and diversity in these regions remain poorly understood. This study explores the daily dynamics of airborne bacterial communities over South Georgia, a large and remote sub-Antarctic Island, and evaluates the influence of environmental factors, local microbiomes, and sampling methodology. Over two weeks, near-surface air samples were collected from coastal and higher-altitude (200 m a.s.l) sites using different air samplers. The Coriolis Compact sampler, run for longer durations, captured higher diversity, while the Coriolis Micro provided high-quality snapshots during shorter sampling windows. Results showed rapid daily turnover in community composition (up to 90%) alongside a stable core microbiome (10–20%). Coastal microbial communities were shaped by local microbiomes, especially wildlife-associated taxa, whereas high-altitude communities were more variable, suggesting influence from long-range microbial dispersal. Environmental factors, including wind direction, temperature, and rainfall, also significantly shaped community structure. These findings highlight the dynamic nature of airborne microbiomes in the sub-Antarctic.

Indexed as

AerobiologyAntarcticaBacteriaBiodiversityDispersalSouth Georgia

Identifiers

PMID40682122
PMCPMC12273333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.