Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40682109›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2025

"I think that that really could benefit a lonely user:" perceptions of overdose response hotlines among people who use opioids.

Rachel E Gicquelais, Rachel P Chenoweth, Nora Jacobson, Caitlin Conway, Gina M Bryan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel E GicquelaisDepartments of Population Health Sciences & Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, United States. gicquelais@wisc.edu.
Rachel P ChenowethUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, Madison, United States.
Nora JacobsonUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, Madison, United States.
Caitlin ConwayUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, Madison, United States.
Gina M BryanUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, Madison, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOverdose response hotlines, such as the SafeSpot and Never Use Alone phone hotlines and Brave smartphone application, are promising tools to reduce fatal overdose risk among people who use drugs (PWUD). These free and confidential services connect callers to a trained operator who monitors them for adverse reactions during and after drug use. We explored PWUD's perceptions of overdose response hotlines.

methodsPWUD receiving substance use treatment in a facility in a Midwestern US city were screened for eligibility using the NIDA-Modified ASSIST questionnaire and invited to enroll if they had a moderate or severe substance involvement score for use of street or prescription opioids. Ten participants completed a 30-45-minute in-depth interview focused on overdose prevention, including perceptions and use of overdose response hotlines, in February 2022. Inductive content analysis was used to describe perspectives on overdose response hotlines.

resultsOnly 1 of the 10 participants had heard of overdose response hotlines, but most were optimistic about their potential benefits for PWUD. One participant said, "I believe that if word was out there, people would use it." Another stated, "I would trust it today. I know that there is [sic] people trying to change what's going on in our culture with opiates." Participants described several potential barriers to utilization, including distrust, especially in the context of drug-induced paranoia and concerns about being arrested, and the cost of an emergency medical response if an overdose occurred. One participant stated, "people get paranoid when they're using drugs. And to be like, 'I'm using!' over the phone, that's not too easy." Another said, "If you call 911, the police are coming and if you're using, you're going to jail."

conclusionsOverdose response hotlines are acceptable and trustworthy fatal overdose prevention tools. However, several barriers may limit their utilization, including distrust, drug-induced paranoia, and the cost and potential consequences should an overdose occur, including arrest or cost of emergency response. Further study of utilization, acceptability, and policy and practical solutions addressing perceived barriers to utilizing these services are needed.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidDrug OverdoseDrug UsersHotlinesOpiate OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersAdultFemaleHarm ReductionHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnalgesics, OpioidE-harm reductionOverdoseOverdose response hotlinesPeople who use drugs

Identifiers

PMID40682109
PMCPMC12275261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.