Trial reportBMC medical education2025
Impact of simulation training on communication skills and informed consent practices in medical students- a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is simulation always a safe learning environment? Anxiety and social anxiety symptoms in first-year medical students during simulated patient encounters.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Generative AI-Assisted Simulation Training Is Associated with Higher Post-Intervention Diagnostic Communication Scores Across Type 2 Diabetes, Obesity, and Breast Cancer Scenarios.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhancing compassionate communication: comparing lecture and simulation training in breaking bad news training.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Competency development in early nursing training: a cross-sectional OSCE study of self-assessment versus examiner ratings.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Effect of a virtual reality simulator for preclinical instruction of operative dentistry on level of competence of undergraduate dental students.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsCommunication skills are essential for surgeons; typified regarding consent. We evaluated communication simulation training (CST) for informed consent competency in senior medical students.
methodsWith institutional ethics approval, CST was implemented during our undergraduate clinical surgery module. Students were divided in two groups by randomized cluster sampling and assessed at baseline on consent competency using a simulated patient (SP) for a colonoscopy scenario. The control group proceeded with standard clinical learning, while the intervention group received CST, which included tutor-led roleplay of good and poor consent for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, followed by peer reenactment and discussion. All students then underwent repeat assessment-an observed SP consent for laparoscopic appendicectomy-by an independent, single-blinded senior clinician within the same week. Communication skills were scored by Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) using both the University College of Dublin School of Medicine OSCE scoring rubric and the externally validated Global Communication Rating Scale (GCRS). Intervention group students were surveyed including anonymously reporting consent confidence pre- and post-CST. All procedures chosen are the three most commonly witnessed by students within their surgical rotations and all are typically familiar with them at this stage in their training.
resultsOf the 122 students who participated, 61 received Communication Skills Training (CST). Baseline UCD and GCRS scores were similar across groups, but post-intervention scores were significantly higher in the CST group. Their average grade improved from a C to a B+, with a medium to large effect size (0.79), while the control group remained at a C. CST students also showed significant gains in GCRS domains-initiation, verbal communication, session structuring, and information relay. Self-confidence improved notably: only 11 students initially felt confident obtaining consent, compared to 62 post-training, with over 80% survey response rate.
conclusionsMedical student CST improves consent communication skills versus observational learning demonstrating its impactful role within clinical undergraduate training. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ISRCTN10251799. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 31.10.24.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.