Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40682099›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2025

Impact of simulation training on communication skills and informed consent practices in medical students- a randomised controlled trial.

Cathleen A McCarrick, Alice Moynihan, Philip D McEntee, Patrick A Boland, Suzanne Donnelly, Helen Heneghan, Ronan A Cahill

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cathleen A McCarrickSection of Surgery and Surgical Specialities, School Of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. Cathleen.mccarrick@ucdconnect.ie.
Alice MoynihanSection of Surgery and Surgical Specialities, School Of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Philip D McEnteeSection of Surgery and Surgical Specialities, School Of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Patrick A BolandSection of Surgery and Surgical Specialities, School Of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Suzanne DonnellySection of Surgery and Surgical Specialities, School Of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Helen HeneghanSection of Surgery and Surgical Specialities, School Of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Ronan A CahillUCD Centre for Precision Surgery, 47 Eccles Street, Nelson Street, Dublin 7, Dublin, Ireland. ronan.cahill@ucd.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCommunication skills are essential for surgeons; typified regarding consent. We evaluated communication simulation training (CST) for informed consent competency in senior medical students.

methodsWith institutional ethics approval, CST was implemented during our undergraduate clinical surgery module. Students were divided in two groups by randomized cluster sampling and assessed at baseline on consent competency using a simulated patient (SP) for a colonoscopy scenario. The control group proceeded with standard clinical learning, while the intervention group received CST, which included tutor-led roleplay of good and poor consent for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, followed by peer reenactment and discussion. All students then underwent repeat assessment-an observed SP consent for laparoscopic appendicectomy-by an independent, single-blinded senior clinician within the same week. Communication skills were scored by Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) using both the University College of Dublin School of Medicine OSCE scoring rubric and the externally validated Global Communication Rating Scale (GCRS). Intervention group students were surveyed including anonymously reporting consent confidence pre- and post-CST. All procedures chosen are the three most commonly witnessed by students within their surgical rotations and all are typically familiar with them at this stage in their training.

resultsOf the 122 students who participated, 61 received Communication Skills Training (CST). Baseline UCD and GCRS scores were similar across groups, but post-intervention scores were significantly higher in the CST group. Their average grade improved from a C to a B+, with a medium to large effect size (0.79), while the control group remained at a C. CST students also showed significant gains in GCRS domains-initiation, verbal communication, session structuring, and information relay. Self-confidence improved notably: only 11 students initially felt confident obtaining consent, compared to 62 post-training, with over 80% survey response rate.

conclusionsMedical student CST improves consent communication skills versus observational learning demonstrating its impactful role within clinical undergraduate training. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ISRCTN10251799. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 31.10.24.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCommunicationEducation, Medical, UndergraduateInformed ConsentSimulation TrainingStudents, MedicalCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMalePatient SimulationSingle-Blind MethodCommunication skillsConsentMedical educationSimulationSimulation trainingUndergraduate surgery

Identifiers

PMID40682099
PMCPMC12273346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.