ReviewBioelectronic medicine2025
Real-time, neural signal processing for high-density brain-implantable devices.
Review in Bioelectronic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward High-Resolution Polymeric Neural Interfaces: A Practical Guide for Electron Beam Lithography.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Full-Stack Architectures for Intelligent Brain-Computer Interfaces.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Bioelectronic medicine: wearable and implantable electronics.Bioelectronic medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in the development of intra-cortical neural interfacing devices show the bright horizon of having access to brain-implantable microsystems with extremely high channel counts in the not-so-distant future. With the fabrication of high-density neural interfacing microelectrode arrays, the handling of the neural signals recorded from the brain is becoming the bottleneck in the realization of next generation wireless brain-implantable microsystems with thousands of parallel channels. Even though a spectrum of engineering efforts has been reported for this purpose at both system and circuit levels, it is now apparent that the most effective solution is to resolve this problem at the signal level. Employment of digital signal processing techniques for data reduction or compression has therefore become an inseparable part of the design of a high-density neural recording brain implant. This paper first addresses technical and technological challenges of transferring massive amount of recorded data off high-density neural recording brain implants. It then provides an overview of the 'on-implant signal processing' techniques that have been employed to successfully stream neuronal activities off the brain. What distinguishes this class of signal processing from signal processing in general is the critical importance of hardware efficiency in the implementation of such techniques in terms of power consumption, circuit size, and real-time operation. The focus of this review is on spike detection and extraction, temporal and spatial neural signal compression, and spike sorting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.