ArticleHarm reduction journal2025
HOME protocol for a national online survey of people who inject drugs.
Article in Harm reduction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most surveys of people who inject drugs (PWID) fail to represent the full population of PWID, because usual recruitment methods do not achieve geographic and sociodemographic diversity. People of color, people residing in rural and/or harm reduction-deprived areas, and people who rarely connect with social services are the least surveyed and understood PWID populations. Online-based recruitment and surveys may better reach these hidden PWID populations than standard venue-based recruitment. As technology use and internet access become more ubiquitous, even for unstably housed populations, research using online-based recruitment and survey techniques are growing in the substance use field. These methods hold promise for obtaining larger and more diverse PWID samples, but there are no standards for using online recruitment and survey administration methods to reach large populations of PWID vulnerable to overdose and other threats. Best practices are needed to maximize data quality, prevent fraudulent responses, and minimize selection biases. The HOME (Harm reduction services Offered through Mail-delivery Expansion) study recruits and enrolls a national, online-recruited, longitudinal cohort of 1233 PWID and follows them for 18 months. Key objectives are to assess prior harm reduction utilization and future uptake of mail-based harm reduction services and retention in these services. We describe our online data collection protocol, including recruitment approaches, detecting fraud, maximizing data quality, and participant retention throughout follow-up. These strategies can inform subsequent large-scale, nationwide efforts that recruit PWID through the internet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.