Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40682061›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2025

English- and Spanish-speaking U.S. adults' perceptions of the most common reasons for abortion: a study of open-ended data before and after Dobbs v. Jackson.

Lucrecia Mena-Meléndez, Xiana Bueno, Kyla M Cary, Nana Amma Asamoah, Brandon L Crawford, Ronna C Turner, Kristen N Jozkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lucrecia Mena-MeléndezDepartment of Applied Health Science, Indiana University, 1033 E 3rd St, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1580-8697
Xiana BuenoDepartment of Applied Health Science, Indiana University, 1033 E 3rd St, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6587-3521
Kyla M CaryDepartment of Applied Health Science, Indiana University, 1033 E 3rd St, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0575-5181
Nana Amma AsamoahEducational Statistics and Research Methods, University of Arkansas, 100 Graduate Education Building, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2633-1903
Brandon L CrawfordDepartment of Applied Health Science, Indiana University, 1033 E 3rd St, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5509-5578
Ronna C TurnerEducational Statistics and Research Methods, University of Arkansas, 100 Graduate Education Building, Fayetteville, AR, 72701, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2984-7649
Kristen N JozkowskiDepartment of Applied Health Science, Indiana University, 1033 E 3rd St, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. knjozkow@iu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3894-5395

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade, has given individual states more capacity to legislate abortion. State legislators have and continue to design and pass laws that restrict or ban abortion, often naming exceptions based on specific reasons (i.e., fetal health, woman's health, rape). Given that these reasons often do not align with those reported by abortion-seekers, it is crucial to assess whether the U.S. public accurately understands why people seek abortions. This study explored a sample of U.S. adults' perceptions of the three most common reasons why someone might get an abortion.

methodsWe analyzed open-ended data from two waves of a 2022 longitudinal survey (n = 681 participants; n = 2,043 responses per wave; n = 4,086 total responses) collected before and after the Dobbs decision in English and Spanish via Ipsos's KnowledgePanel®. We explored three main research questions: (1) What does the U.S. public perceive to be the most common reasons for someone to seek abortion? (2) Are there differences in perceived reasons before and after the Dobbs v. Jackson decision? (3) Are there differences in perceived reasons across languages?

resultsFindings indicated that people perceive the three most common reasons to seek abortion to be: unwanted/unplanned pregnancy reasons, violence-related reasons, and health reasons. After the Dobbs decision, there was an increase in respondents mentioning that people have abortions for health reasons and financial reasons, and a decrease in responses related to unwanted/unplanned pregnancy reasons, not ready/unprepared reasons, and partner-related reasons. Additionally, we found significant differences in perceptions between languages (i.e., English and Spanish). We also note discrepancies between perceived reasons among our sample and reasons reported by abortion patients in national studies.

conclusionsThis study underscores the public's misconceptions of reasons for seeking abortion and the importance of correcting such misunderstandings to ensure alignment of public sentiment and legislative and judicial policy post-Dobbs.

Indexed as

Abortion ApplicantsAbortion, InducedAbortion, LegalAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLanguageLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionPregnancyUnited StatesYoung AdultAbortion attitudesAbortion reasonsDobbs decisionLongitudinal dataMulti-language researchOpen-ended data

Identifiers

PMID40682061
PMCPMC12275407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.