Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40682037›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2025

The implementation of take-home naloxone: Lessons learned from a 3-year take-home naloxone project in Germany.

Simon Fleißner, Larissa Steimle, Dirk Schäffer, Bernd Werse, Daniel Deimel, Maria Kuban, Heino Stöver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simon FleißnerFaculty of Social Sciences, Technical University Nuernberg Georg Simon Ohm, Keßlerplatz 12, 90489, Nuremberg, Germany. simon.fleissner@th-nuernberg.de.
Larissa SteimleInstitute of Addiction Research, Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Nibelungenplatz 1, 60318, Frankfurt a.M, Germany.
Dirk SchäfferGerman AIDS Federation, Wilhelmstr. 138, 10963, Berlin, Germany.
Bernd WerseInstitute of Addiction Research, Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Nibelungenplatz 1, 60318, Frankfurt a.M, Germany.
Daniel DeimelFaculty of Social Sciences, Technical University Nuernberg Georg Simon Ohm, Keßlerplatz 12, 90489, Nuremberg, Germany.
Maria KubanGerman AIDS Federation, Wilhelmstr. 138, 10963, Berlin, Germany.
Heino StöverInstitute of Addiction Research, Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Nibelungenplatz 1, 60318, Frankfurt a.M, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTake-home naloxone (THN) can prevent deaths related to opioid overdoses. Despite the first THN project in Germany in 1998, the availability of naloxone for people who use opioids (PWUO) is still scarce. We present the results of the German-wide THN-project NALtrain, which aimed to implement THN nationwide. Firstly, we present data collected during NALtrain and secondly, we use this data to critically reflect on the project and thereby draw conclusions that could inform future THN projects.

methodNALtrain was conducted between July 2021 and June 2024. Descriptive statistical analysis of the documentation of 74 train-the-trainer events and following naloxone trainings conducted by the trained staff were carried out.

results864 staff members from approximately 373 organizations (mainly harm reduction services) participated in 74 train-the-trainer courses. Of the 373 organizations 123 conducted 784 naloxone trainings for PWUO and reached 2,333 PWUO, of whom 1,451 received THN. The goal of training 800 staff members was met, while the goals of reaching 400 organizations and 10,000 PWUO were missed. The implementation of THN is unevenly distributed across the German federal states, especially concentrated in Bavaria. The core learnings are that the prescription-only status of THN leads to extra organizational efforts and hinders the availability of THN for individuals with the highest risk of overdose.

conclusionConsidering the proportion of organizations offering THN, they can still be classified as "early adopters". These may serve as role models for the broader majority. Free available THN and centrally coordinated support of implementation including recurring follow-up can be key to a broader availability of THN in Germany. In future initiatives physicians and medical settings should be prioritized.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersGermanyHarm ReductionHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsHarm reductionImplementationOpioid overdoseOverdose emergency trainingTake-home Naloxone

Identifiers

PMID40682037
PMCPMC12273464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.