ArticleBMC medical education2025
Health systems science and systems thinking: qualitative evaluation of preclinical medical student reflections in a role-play simulation game.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe importance of systems thinking in Health Systems Science is increasingly recognised, yet its integration into undergraduate medical education remains inconsistent. Evidence on the use of simulation games to promote experiential learning and systems thinking development during the preclinical phase is also limited. This study examined the effect of the simulation game Friday Night at the ER (FNER) on the development of systems thinking in preclinical medical students. The research questions focused on (1) What core systems thinking strategies affected team performance scores in the FNER game? (2) How were these strategies related to the Habits of a Systems Thinker framework? (3) What emotions and insights did students gain through the FNER game?
methodsFollowing simulation-based experiential learning in a systems-focused curriculum, we analysed open-ended reflections from 22 preclinical medical students (mean age 24.3; 11 females, 11 males) using a hybrid qualitative content analysis. Strategy-related responses were examined through directed content analysis informed by two frameworks: core systems thinking strategies embedded in FNER and the Habits of a Systems Thinker, representing foundational Health Systems Science competencies. Emotional and insight-related reflections were analysed inductively to identify effective emergent themes.
resultsStudents employed three key strategies—collaboration, data-driven decision-making, and innovation—during gameplay. High-performing teams demonstrated a more frequent and integrated use of these strategies, implicitly applying multiple habits of a systems thinker, such as Habit 1 (seeing the big picture), Habit 6 (changing perspectives), and Habit 11 (considering consequences). Low-performing teams, focused on individual tasks, failed to drive collaboration at the team and organisational levels, and remained stuck in linear thinking. Five effective themes emerged from students’ reflections: collaboration and teamwork, value-driven decision-making, innovation and change, patient-centred care, and indirect experience of hospital systems.
conclusionsFNER is an educational tool that promotes the use of role-play simulation games to teach systems thinking, a core linking domain in Health Systems Science. By fostering collaboration, innovation, and data-driven decision-making, the game helps preclinical medical students begin forming a professional identity as system-based practice physicians capable of navigating and improving complex healthcare systems.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.