ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
A new approach for microbe-disease association prediction: incorporating representation learning of latent relationships.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPredicting associations between microbes and diseases is crucial for clinical diagnosis and therapy. However, biological experiments are time-intensive, necessitating efficient computational models. Traditional models rely on existing microbe-disease associations, but limited data often restricts their effectiveness. This scarcity of information hinders the construction of a comprehensive association network, prompting the need for innovative solutions.
methodsWe propose RKGATMDA, a deep learning framework for microbe-disease association prediction. Utilizing a graph attention network, RKGATMDA learns representations from the microbe-disease association network. To address the limitation of insufficient association information, we introduce Random K-Nearest Neighbors to uncover latent relationships, enhancing representation learning. During each training iteration, associations are expanded based on attention scores, and a multi-head attention mechanism integrates diverse features, enabling RKGATMDA to capture comprehensive interactions between microbes and diseases.
resultsResults Experimental results show that RKGATMDA achieves AUC values of 0.8906 in 5-fold cross-validation, 0.8999 in global leave-one-out cross-validation, and 0.7246 in local leave-one-out cross-validation, outperforming previous methods such as ABHMDA, KATZHMDA, LRLSHMDA, BiRWHMDA, and NTSHMDA. Case studies on asthma, colon cancer, and colorectal carcinoma further validate its predictive power.
conclusionOur findings demonstrate that RKGATMDA effectively predicts microbe-disease associations, with at least 9 out of the top 10 prediction pairs validated by biological evidence. This highlights the potential of RKGATMDA as a valuable tool in microbial-disease research, offering a promising approach for identifying novel associations and advancing our understanding of microbial pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.