Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40682009›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Hierarchy hurts: a comparative cross-sectional analysis of empathy and its determinants in medical, midwifery, and nursing students.

Lena Maria Weber, Lena Bauer, Amand Führer

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lena Maria WeberInstitute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics (IMEBI), Faculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 20, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Lena BauerInstitute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics (IMEBI), Faculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 20, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Amand FührerInstitute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics (IMEBI), Faculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 20, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany. amand-gabriel.fuehrer@uk-halle.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmpathy plays a crucial role in healthcare, affecting both patient outcomes and provider well-being. Despite its importance, the adaptive nature of empathy remains not fully understood, making it challenging for educational institutions to effectively teach it. This study addresses this gap by investigating two key questions: What is the relationship between social dominance orientation and empathy among students in medicine, nursing, and midwifery? And, what individual factors – including personality traits, sociodemographic background, and self-perceived empathy – are associated with variations in empathy across these student groups?

methodsThis cross-sectional study, conducted in April 2023 at Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany, examined empathy among medical, BSc Midwifery, BSc Nursing, and MSc Health and Nursing Sciences students, aiming to identify its determinants, considering personality traits, socio-economic background, and elitist attitudes. The survey included the Jefferson Scale of Empathy for Health Profession Students (JSE-HPS), NEO-Five-Factor-Inventory (NEO-FFI-30), Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI-15), the Short Scale on Social Dominance Orientation (KSDO-3), and the MacArthur Scale. The authors analyzed the data using multiple linear regression models, controlling for relevant confounders.

resultsA total of 252 students participated in the survey, including 173 medical, 35 BSc Midwifery, 24 BSc Nursing, and 20 MSc Health and Nursing Sciences students. Empathy levels varied between disciplines, with BSc Midwifery students exhibiting the highest scores (114.83, 95%-CI = 111.77; 117.88), and BSc Nursing students the lowest (106.25, 95%-CI = 103.1; 109.4). Multiple regression analysis revealed that empathy was positively associated with Openness (β = 2.68, 95%-CI = 1.16; 4.19), Agreeableness (β = 6.01, 95%-CI = 3.9; 8.12), and having children (β = 5.02, 95%-CI = 0.25; 9.79). Conversely, students with non-medical training prior to university (β = -9.86, 95%-CI = -16.84; -2.88) and higher Social Dominance Orientation (β = -0.64, 95%-CI = -1.11; -0.16) showed lower empathy scores.

conclusionsIn addition to confirming previous findings, this study is, to the best of our knowledge, the first to investigate Social Dominance Orientation in the context of healthcare students’ empathy and describe its negative association. The findings suggest that addressing hierarchical attitudes in empathy education could positively impact healthcare delivery.

trial registrationThis was not undertaken as the research did not involve a health care intervention on human participants.

Indexed as

EmpathyMidwiferySocial DominanceStudents, MedicalStudents, NursingAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultElitismEmpathyMedical studentsMidwifery studentsNursing studentsPersonality

Identifiers

PMID40682009
PMCPMC12273016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.