ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
A densely connected framework for cancer subtype classification.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep Generative and Graph-Based Representation Learning for Multiomics Survival Stratification in Ovarian Cancer: Secondary Analysis.JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReliable identification of cancer subtypes is crucial for devising personalized treatment strategies. Integrating multi-omics data has proven to be an effective method for analyzing cancer subtypes. By combining molecular information across various layers, a more comprehensive understanding of biological characteristics and disease mechanisms can be achieved.
resultsWe propose DEGCN, a novel deep learning model that integrates a three-channel Variational Autoencoder (VAE) for multi-omics dimensionality reduction and a densely connected Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) for effective subtype classification. DEGCN leverages the complementary strengths of non-linear feature extraction and graph-based relational learning, enabling accurate and robust classification of renal cancer subtypes. Experimental results demonstrate that DEGCN achieves a cross-validated classification accuracy of 97.06% ± 2.04% on renal cancer data, outperforming conventional machine learning algorithms and state-of-the-art deep learning models. Moreover, its generalization ability is validated on breast and gastric cancer datasets from TCGA, with cross-validated classification accuracies of 89.82% ± 2.29% and 88.64% ± 5.24%, respectively, indicating strong cross-cancer predictive performance.
conclusionThe study highlights the outstanding performance of DEGCN in heterogeneous data integration and classification accuracy, demonstrating the model's potential in cancer subtype prediction and its application in guiding clinical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.