ReviewDermatology and therapy2025
Current Treatments and Future Directions for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: a Narrative Review of Completed and Ongoing Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Biologic Therapies.
Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Povorcitinib for hidradenitis suppurativa: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled STOP-HS1 and STOP-HS2 phase 3 trials.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- American Academy of Dermatology 2026 Annual Meeting: Updates in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Medical Management.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Review
- Neuropathic Pain Management Using Novel Biologics in Moderate-to-Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- Hidradenitis suppurativa: epidemiology, diagnosis, molecular pathogenesis and therapy.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, progressive inflammatory disease characterized by recurrent nodules, abscesses, draining tunnels, and scarring. Current treatment strategies for patients with HS typically involve a combination of therapeutic and surgical interventions that are tailored to the severity and extent of the disease. Treatment of patients with mild disease often includes topical or systemic antibiotics followed by anti-androgen therapies; however, these treatments are off-label and are generally only modestly effective for patients with moderate-to-severe disease. The lack of dedicated therapies targeting pathogenic mechanisms of HS has historically contributed to the unmet needs for disease management. These needs have been addressed recently by the emergence of biologic therapies, which can provide rapid and sustained symptom and disease control for patients who have poor treatment responses to initial therapies and progressive disease. Biologics have become an integral component in treatment strategies for patients with HS, but the unique clinical benefits and safety profile of each biologic can impact treatment decisions for individual patients. Recent elucidation of unique immunological pathways that contribute to HS pathophysiology may lead to the development of novel therapeutics that would expand the current therapeutic options, especially for patients with advanced disease. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the present therapeutic landscape for HS, with a particular focus on the mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety of biologic therapies either approved or under clinical investigation for the treatment of patients with HS. We also provide expert commentary on future directions of HS therapies as they pertain to recent research on the immunopathology of HS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.