Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40681914›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025

Particulate vs monolithic aerogel linings in capillaries for Raman signal gain of aqueous solutions.

Felix Spiske, Andreas Siegfried Braeuer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Felix SpiskeInstitute of Thermal, Environmental and Resources' Process Engineering (ITUN), Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg (TUBAF), 09599, Freiberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8242-9608
Andreas Siegfried BraeuerInstitute of Thermal, Environmental and Resources' Process Engineering (ITUN), Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg (TUBAF), 09599, Freiberg, Germany. andreas.braeuer@tun.tu-freiberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7816-4027

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13N15233European Regional Development Fund 100689010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compare particulate versus monolithic silica aerogel-lined capillaries as liquid core waveguides for Raman signal gain of liquid aqueous samples. The manufacturing process of monolithic linings, which aims to address the limited robustness of particulate aerogel linings, is discussed in detail and compared with that of particulate linings. The linings of both capillary types are characterized using scanning electron microscopy. Raman signal gain of pure water and aqueous solutions is evaluated for each type. The aqueous solutions are samples drawn at different times from the oxidative conversion of glycerol to formic acid (OxFA process). It is analyzed whether the Raman signal gain provided by aerogel-lined capillaries is affected by the property changes in this exemplary industrial process caused by the ongoing chemical reaction. Finally, the mechanical robustness of the linings and the stability of the Raman signal gain are tested under rapid and repeated capillary purge in both types.

Indexed as

Aerogel-lined capillaryLiquid core waveguideLiquid core waveguide capillary cellMonolithic aerogel-lined capillaryParticulate aerogel-lined capillaryRaman spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID40681914
PMCPMC12528208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.