ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Development of an artificial intelligence algorithm for automated surgical gestures annotation.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identifying novel indicators of non-technical skills derived from operative video annotation.The British journal of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical gestures analysis is a promising method to assess surgical procedure quality, but manual annotation is time-consuming. We aimed to develop a recurrent neural network for automated surgical gesture annotation using simulated robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. We have previously manually annotated 161 videos with five different surgical gestures (Regular dissection, Hemostatic control, Clip application, Needle handling, and Suturing). We created a model consisting of two neural networks: a pre-trained feature extractor (VisionTransformer using Imagenet) and a classification head (recurrent neural network with a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM(128) and fully connected layer)). The data set was split into a training + validation set and a test set. The trained model labeled input sequences with one of the five surgical gestures. The overall performance of the neural networks was assessed by metrics for multi-label classification and defined Total Agreement, an extended version of Intersection over Union (IoU). Our neural network could predict the class of surgical gestures with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.96) and an F1-score of 0.71 (95% CI 0.67-0.75). The network could classify each surgical gesture with high accuracies (0.84-0.97) and high specificities (0.90-0.99), but with lower sensitivities (0.62-0.81). The average Total Agreement for each gesture class was between 0.72 (95% CI ± 0.03) and 0.91 (95% CI ± 0.02). We successfully developed a high-performing neural network to analyze gestures in simulated surgical procedures. Our next step is to use the network to annotate videos and evaluate their efficacy in predicting patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.