ArticleScientific reports2025
Longitudinal changes in KL6 levels predict acute exacerbation in fibrotic interstitial lung disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of survival and transplantation outcomes in Japanese patients with interstitial lung disease referred for lung transplantation: a retrospective single-center study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Geospatial and temporal trends of interstitial lung disease subtypes and KL-6 biomarker in China: a nationwide study (2016-2024).Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Secukinumab-Induced Interstitial Pneumonia in a Patient with Psoriasis.Balkan medical journal · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of baseline serum KL-6 for mortality risk in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis receiving antifibrotic therapy: A retrospective cohort study.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels are potentially indicative markers of prospective acute exacerbation (AE) in interstitial lung disease (ILD); however, their longitudinal trends have not been sufficiently investigated. We investigated the predictive ability of patient-specific changes in serum KL-6 levels for predicting AE in patients with fibrotic ILD. We included patients with fibrotic ILDs from the RWD database in Japan who received antifibrotic therapy and had at least two serum KL-6 values during the follow-up. The outcome was AE defined based on primary diagnoses, emergency admission, and pulse/high-dose steroids on the day of or after admission. We used the joint regression model integrating longitudinal and survival analyses to assess the predictive ability of each patient's serial serum KL-6 measurements for AE. Among 939 patients with fibrotic ILDs, 194 (21%) patients experienced AE during follow-up (event rate, 0.13/person-year; 1-year incidence, 35%). The AE hazard ratio comparing patients with differing cumulative serum KL-6 levels was 1.54 (95% confidence interval: 1.20-1.98, p < 0.001). In conclusion, AE in fibrotic ILD patients on antifibrotic therapy may be predicted by high baseline KL-6 levels and their increasing trend. Serial KL-6 monitoring can serve as a valuable tool in a multifaceted approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.