ReviewNature protocols2026
Fluorescence-activated particle sorting for condensate purification.
Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomolecular condensates in plant stress and development: recent advances and emerging concepts.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- A practical guide to investigating biomolecular condensates: a comment from the plant community.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Review
- Role of CPEBs in Learning and Memory.Journal of neurochemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Condensates are receiving increasing attention because of their ability to organize subcellular space. In eukaryotes, nuclear condensates include nucleoli and paraspeckles, and cytoplasmic ones include P-bodies (PBs) and stress granules. One approach to investigate condensate biology is through analyzing their protein and RNA content. However, purifying condensates remains a challenge because of their densities being similar to various other organelles, and the absence of protein markers accumulating exclusively in them. These limitations, combined with the generally low number of condensates per cell, necessitate new approaches to tackle their purification. Here, we present a protocol describing fluorescence-activated particle sorting (FAPS) for purifying condensates. In brief, FAPS involves fluorescently labeling condensates to identify and isolate them from other cellular components via sorting. In this Protocol, we focus on PB purification, quality control and downstream characterization of PB protein and RNA contents. Although originally developed to purify PBs from human cell lines, FAPS can be adapted to various condensates across model organisms. The procedure requires knowledge in basic cell culture, molecular biology and flow cytometry and access to a fluorescence-activated cell sorter with sufficient sensitivity. It requires ~25-30 d, including a hands-on period of 15 d, to complete. In summary, FAPS allows the characterization of the content of diverse condensates across cell types and organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40681834What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.