Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40681834›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2026

Fluorescence-activated particle sorting for condensate purification.

Annie Munier Godebert, Dominique Weil, Adham Safieddine

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Role of CPEBs in Learning and Memory.Journal of neurochemistry · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Annie Munier GodebertResearch Center Saint-Antoine (CRSA), CISA Flow Cytometry Facility, UMRS 938, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Dominique WeilSorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Development, Adaptation and Ageing, Dev2A, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7630-1772
Adham SafieddineSorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Development, Adaptation and Ageing, Dev2A, Paris, France. adham.safieddine@sorbonne-universite.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-9324-9037

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-19-CE12-0024-01Institut National Du Cancer (French National Cancer Institute) 2022-082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Condensates are receiving increasing attention because of their ability to organize subcellular space. In eukaryotes, nuclear condensates include nucleoli and paraspeckles, and cytoplasmic ones include P-bodies (PBs) and stress granules. One approach to investigate condensate biology is through analyzing their protein and RNA content. However, purifying condensates remains a challenge because of their densities being similar to various other organelles, and the absence of protein markers accumulating exclusively in them. These limitations, combined with the generally low number of condensates per cell, necessitate new approaches to tackle their purification. Here, we present a protocol describing fluorescence-activated particle sorting (FAPS) for purifying condensates. In brief, FAPS involves fluorescently labeling condensates to identify and isolate them from other cellular components via sorting. In this Protocol, we focus on PB purification, quality control and downstream characterization of PB protein and RNA contents. Although originally developed to purify PBs from human cell lines, FAPS can be adapted to various condensates across model organisms. The procedure requires knowledge in basic cell culture, molecular biology and flow cytometry and access to a fluorescence-activated cell sorter with sufficient sensitivity. It requires ~25-30 d, including a hands-on period of 15 d, to complete. In summary, FAPS allows the characterization of the content of diverse condensates across cell types and organisms.

Indexed as

Biomolecular CondensatesFlow CytometryHumansRNARNA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.