ArticleJournal of community health2025
Contributions of Civil Society Organizations to the Provision of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services to Vulnerable Populations in Latin America.
Article in Journal of community health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The involvement of civil society organizations in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) programs in Latin America began to expand during the health sector reforms era. These organizations have undergone significant changes over the decades, being able to collaborate with government agencies, the private sector and international agencies with the commitment to address the specific needs of vulnerable populations in the countries. We provide a synthesized and analytical description of the experiences of 17 civil organizations that carry out actions in the field of SRH in five Latin American countries. The aim is to understand the variety of organizational models, the populations served, the funding, and the activities they perform in the SRH field. A multi-case study focused on 17 organizations that primarily carry actions on SRH, especially for vulnerable populations in Latin America: Colombia, Guatemala, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru. Data collection was carried out in two stages: gathering preliminary information and semi-structured interviews with 55 members of the organizations. The analysis was based on categories constructed prior to the process. These are described through four categories: Characteristics of target populations; Relationship with government structure and other interested actors; Activities Carried Out in Response to SRH; Achievements and scope of civil organizations in sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights. Civil society organizations in the studied countries are essential within health systems, acting as agents of equity, expert service providers, and with a strong commitment to their target populations. In this study, they encountered several financial and political challenges. Their ability to adapt and the recognition they receive from the populations they serve stands out. Civil organizations not only fill significant gaps in the provision of SRH services but also become catalytic forces for social change and equity. It is essential to develop funding mechanisms and support policies that allow their continuous operation, expansion, and informed participation in decision-making processes in Latin America.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.