ArticleBehavior research methods2025
Automatic temporal analysis of speech: A quick and objective pipeline for the assessment of overt stuttering.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An active inference account of stuttering behavior.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Atypical gut microbiota composition in a mouse model of developmental stuttering.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluency disorders, such as developmental stuttering, have been characterized by behavior such as blocks, repetitions, and prolongations in speech. Accurate measurement of overt stuttering behavior can aid in diagnostic evaluation and the determination of optimal treatment for this disorder. This study proposes a method - Automatic Temporal Analysis of Speech (ATAS) - for the assessment of speech fluency based on the detection and quantification of discrete pauses and vocal events. Our ATAS metrics include speech rate, total pause time, pause count, mean pause duration, mean vocal duration, pause duration variability, and vocal duration variability. We used oral reading audio samples from a total of 35 English-speaking participants: 17 from adults who stutter (AWS) and 18 from adults who do not stutter (AWNS). AWS, in general, exhibited more pausing or hesitancy in speech compared to AWNS, as evidenced by slower speech rate, greater total pause time, higher pause count, and longer mean duration of pause events. Numerous pause and vocal metrics acquired from ATAS were correlated with a canonical measure of stuttering frequency percent syllables stuttered, suggesting that automatically detected temporal metrics of pause and vocal events within continuous speech are highly associated with overt stuttering behavior. ATAS metrics generally predicted the status of each participant as either an AWS or AWNS grouping with accuracies considerably higher than random guessing using random forest and LSTM classifiers. This pipeline may provide an alternative and complementary method that speech-language pathologists and other health professionals can use in the assessment of fluency disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.