ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2025
Geographic and clinical patterns of left atrial appendage occlusion utilization across the United States.
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeft Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO) has become a more common procedure designed to reduce stroke risk in patients who are intolerant of systemic anticoagulation. The speed of adoption and broader application to patients outside of the narrow trial patients motivates an assessment to understand whether specific operator characteristics affect procedural volume.
methodsUsing US CMS and Open Payments datasets, we explored LAAO procedural volumes, including temporal and geographical trends. We also examined how operator characteristics affected procedural volumes, including specialty, individual yearly procedural volume, and payments from LAAO manufacturers to clinicians.
resultsLAAO procedural volume increased from 6,069 to 29,083 and 15 to 80 procedures per 100,000 enrollees from 2017 to 2021. Clinicians performing LAAO increased from 293 to 1038 and were primarily split between cardiac electrophysiology, interventional cardiology, and other cardiology subspecialties (48% Vs. 21% vs 26%, respectively, in 2021). There was a considerable geographic variation in procedural volume, with 46 states below 100 procedures per 100,000 enrollees. The highest-use state had over 250 LAAO procedures per 100,000 enrollees. Nearly all states saw an increase in procedural volume from 2017 to 2021. We found no meaningful correlation between payments from device manufacturers to clinicians and procedural volume.
conclusionsWe found a significant increase and high geographic variability in LAAO use throughout the United States. No clinically meaningful correlation existed between payments from LAAO manufacturers to clinicians and subsequent procedural volume.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40681756What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.