Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40681749›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Genomic insertion of ancestral uricase into human liver cells to determine metabolic consequences of pseudogenization.

Lais de Lima Balico, Eric A Gaucher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lais de Lima BalicoDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, 30312, USA.
Eric A GaucherDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, 30312, USA. egaucher@gsu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biological role of urate (uric acid) during primate evolution has been unclear ever since it was discovered over 100 years ago that humans have unusually high levels of the small molecule compared to most other mammals. Humans (including all apes) are uncharacteristically susceptible to the build-up of urate because we no longer have a functional uricase enzyme capable of oxidizing this highly insoluble molecule. We have now utilized CRISPR technology to insert functional ancestral uricase into the genome of human liver cells to address recent metabolic hypotheses that our ancestral primates inactivated uricase as a mechanism to increase triglyceride production in response to fructose and/or starvation. Uricase expression is confirmed in both hepatocyte monolayer and spheroid tissue cultures, and its expression reduces intracellular urate levels. The presence of uricase is also shown to prevent an increase in triglyceride production upon cellular uptake of fructose in both culture conditions. Our results make progress that further describes a potential advantageous biological role of urate during primate evolution.

Indexed as

HepatocytesLiverUrate OxidaseAnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsFructoseHumansTriglyceridesUric AcidFructoseTriglyceridesUrate OxidaseUric Acid

Identifiers

PMID40681749
PMCPMC12274406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.