ArticleScientific reports2025
Intraspecific variation in sex-biased dispersal of a threatened ecotone butterfly between forest patches in a mosaic landscape.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Forest patches are vital for saving biodiversity in fragmented temperate agricultural landscapes. They support threatened species, e.g. the charismatic Clouded Apollo butterfly, Parnassius mnemosyne, which lives at forest-meadow edges as it requires resources available in both of these biotopes. Dispersal is a key process to ensure gene flow and the colonization of vacant patches, hence knowledge on mobility is key in the context of conservation. Using intensive mark-recapture sampling, we investigated a lowland metapopulation inhabiting a complex of coppiced forest patches and adjacent grasslands in NE Poland. In order to account for intra-specific variability in movement abilities, three size groups based on their wing length were distinguished. Large males covered significantly longer distances than small ones. In turn, larger females undertook dispersal most frequently, but also experienced significantly higher mortality compared to all other groups of both sexes. This implies that higher emigration propensity (at least in females) do not necessarily translate into greater dispersal success. The movements of all butterflies were relatively short, which indicates restricted dispersal, despite the lack of clear barriers. The current forest management appears optimal, but changes in the use of open spaces may lead to a loss of connectivity within the focal system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.