Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40681690›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Determination of lung cancer exhaled breath biomarkers using machine learning-a new analysis framework.

Tlotlo Cassandra Setlhare, Atlang Gild Mpolokang, Emmanuel Flahaut, George Chimowa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tlotlo Cassandra SetlhareDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Private Bag 16, Boseja Ward, Palapye, Botswana.
Atlang Gild MpolokangDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Private Bag 16, Boseja Ward, Palapye, Botswana.
Emmanuel FlahautCIRIMAT, Toulouse INP, CNR, Université de Toulouse, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31062, Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
George ChimowaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Private Bag 16, Boseja Ward, Palapye, Botswana. chimowag@biust.ac.bw.

Funding

African Academy of Sciences DCI-PANAF/2020/420-028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exhaled breath samples of lung cancer patients (LC), tuberculosis (TB) patients and asymptomatic controls (C) were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Ten volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were identified as possible biomarkers after confounders were statistically eliminated to enhance biomarker specificity. The diagnostic potential of these possible biomarkers was evaluated using multiple machine learning models and their performance for classifying patients and controls was compared. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) emerged as the best-performing model for separating lung cancer from controls, with a recall (sensitivity) of 82%, precision of 90%, accuracy of 80% and F1-score of 86%. To further validate this model, TB data was introduced as a confounding disease, and the model achieved precision, recall, accuracy and F1-score of 88% each, in distinguishing lung cancer from TB. These findings address the inter-disease variability and underscores the reliability of the reported VOCs as potential biomarkers of lung cancer. This study establishes a new framework integrating machine learning and confounder elimination for biomarker confirmation.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorLung NeoplasmsMachine LearningVolatile Organic CompoundsAdultAgedBreath TestsCase-Control StudiesExhalationFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID40681690
PMCPMC12274551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.