ArticleScientific reports2025
Speech prediction of a listener via EEG-based classification through subject-independent phase dissimilarity model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the consistency of cross-subject electroencephalography (EEG) phase tracking in response to auditory stimuli via speech classification. Repeated listening to audio induces consistent EEG phase alignments across trials for listeners. If the phase of EEG aligns more closely with acoustics, cross-subject EEG phase tracking should also exhibit significant similarity. To test this hypothesis, we propose a generalized subject-independent phase dissimilarity model, which eliminates the requirement for training on individuals. Our proposed model assesses the duration and number of cross-subject EEG-phase-alignments, influencing accuracy. EEG responses were recorded from seventeen participants who listened three times to 22 unfamiliar one-minute passages from audiobooks. Our findings demonstrate that the EEG phase is consistent within repeated cross-subject trials. Our model achieved an impressive EEG-based classification accuracy of 74.96%. Furthermore, an average of nine distinct phasic templates from different participants is sufficient to effectively train the model, regardless of the duration of EEG phase alignments. Additionally, the duration of EEG-phase-alignments positively correlates with classification accuracy. These results indicate that predicting a listener's speech is feasible by training the model with phasic templates from other listeners, owing to the consistent cross-subject EEG phase alignments with speech acoustics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.