Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40681689›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Speech prediction of a listener via EEG-based classification through subject-independent phase dissimilarity model.

Alireza Malekmohammadi, Josef P Rauschecker, Gordon Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alireza MalekmohammadiInstitute for Cognitive Systems, Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, 80333, Munich, Germany. alireza.malekmohammadi@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1735-1048
Josef P RauscheckerLaboratory of Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition, Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, 20057, USA.
Gordon ChengInstitute for Cognitive Systems, Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, 80333, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the consistency of cross-subject electroencephalography (EEG) phase tracking in response to auditory stimuli via speech classification. Repeated listening to audio induces consistent EEG phase alignments across trials for listeners. If the phase of EEG aligns more closely with acoustics, cross-subject EEG phase tracking should also exhibit significant similarity. To test this hypothesis, we propose a generalized subject-independent phase dissimilarity model, which eliminates the requirement for training on individuals. Our proposed model assesses the duration and number of cross-subject EEG-phase-alignments, influencing accuracy. EEG responses were recorded from seventeen participants who listened three times to 22 unfamiliar one-minute passages from audiobooks. Our findings demonstrate that the EEG phase is consistent within repeated cross-subject trials. Our model achieved an impressive EEG-based classification accuracy of 74.96%. Furthermore, an average of nine distinct phasic templates from different participants is sufficient to effectively train the model, regardless of the duration of EEG phase alignments. Additionally, the duration of EEG-phase-alignments positively correlates with classification accuracy. These results indicate that predicting a listener's speech is feasible by training the model with phasic templates from other listeners, owing to the consistent cross-subject EEG phase alignments with speech acoustics.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographySpeechSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultClassificationEEGPhaseSpeech

Identifiers

PMID40681689
PMCPMC12274610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.