Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40681661›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2026

The impact of anti-craving medication on cue reactivity and abstinence in patients undergoing alcohol detoxification: some preliminary evidence from a retrospective event-related potentials study.

Clémence Dousset, Sonia Sistiaga, Anaïs Ingels, Catherine Hanak, Hendrik Kajosch, Salvatore Campanella

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clémence Dousset *Laboratoire de Psychologie Médicale et d'Addictologie, ULB Neuroscience Institute (UNI), CHU Brugmann-Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium.
Sonia Sistiaga *Laboratoire de Psychologie Médicale et d'Addictologie, ULB Neuroscience Institute (UNI), CHU Brugmann-Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium.
Anaïs IngelsLaboratoire de Psychologie Médicale et d'Addictologie, ULB Neuroscience Institute (UNI), CHU Brugmann-Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium.
Catherine HanakLaboratoire de Psychologie Médicale et d'Addictologie, ULB Neuroscience Institute (UNI), CHU Brugmann-Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium.
Hendrik KajoschLaboratoire de Psychologie Médicale et d'Addictologie, ULB Neuroscience Institute (UNI), CHU Brugmann-Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium.
Salvatore CampanellaLaboratoire de Psychologie Médicale et d'Addictologie, ULB Neuroscience Institute (UNI), CHU Brugmann-Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium. salvatore.campanella@chu-brugmann.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7331-5906

Funding

Brugmann Foundation Brugmann FoundationFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleWhile medications such as acamprosate, baclofen, or naltrexone have shown promising effects in the treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD), meta-analyses have yielded conflicting findings regarding their efficacy. This retrospective study examined whether alcohol cue reactivity and its neural correlates could serve as protective factors against relapse in AUD inpatients receiving pharmacological treatment during a three-week detoxification program.

methodFifty-eight inpatients diagnosed with AUD undergoing a three-weeks detoxification program were selected. These patients received either acamprosate (n = 21), naltrexone (n = 21), or baclofen (n = 16) during their stay. They completed an event-related potential cue-reactivity task at the beginning (T0) and end (T1) of the program. Follow-up data on relapse were collected up to two months post- discharge.

resultsThe Log-Rank (Mantel-Cox) test ([Formula: see text] (2) = 5.84; p =.059) revealed a marginally significant difference in survival distributions between medications. A significant difference emerged between baclofen and acamprosate groups ([Formula: see text] (1) = 4.73; p =.030), with slower return to alcohol use in the baclofen group. No other significant difference emerged between the acamprosate and naltrexone groups or between the naltrexone and baclofen groups (p >.05). Only the baclofen group showed a significant reduction in oddball P3 amplitude between T0 and T1 (p =.002), suggesting decreased neural cue reactivity.

conclusionA reduction in neural cue reactivity, observed exclusively in the baclofen group, may act as a protective factor against early relapse in AUD. However, this study was underpowered, and findings should be interpreted cautiously until confirmed in larger prospective investigations.

Indexed as

Alcohol AbstinenceAlcohol DeterrentsAlcoholismCravingEvoked PotentialsTaurineAcamprosateAdultBaclofenCuesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNaltrexoneAcamprosateAlcohol DeterrentsBaclofenNaltrexoneTaurineAcamprosateAlcohol use disorderBaclofenDetoxificationEvent-related potentialsNaltrexoneRelapse

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.