Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40681625›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluation of food waste treatment techniques using aczel alsina based MAGDM model in the q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft structure.

Rana Muhammad Zulqarnain, Hongwei Wang, Usman Zulfiqar, Rifaqat Ali, Imran Siddique, Abdullatif Saleh Ghallab, Hafiz Shahzar Riaz Khan Tareen, Sohaib Abdal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rana Muhammad ZulqarnainSchool of Economics and Management, Tongji University, No. 1239 Siping Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, China.
Hongwei WangSchool of Economics and Management, Tongji University, No. 1239 Siping Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, China. hwwang@tongji.edu.cn.
Usman ZulfiqarDepartment of Business Administration, Lahore Leads University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Rifaqat AliDepartment of Mathematics, Applied College in Mohayil Asir, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Imran SiddiqueDepartment of Mathematics, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, 40100, Pakistan.
Abdullatif Saleh GhallabFaculty of Computing and Information Technology, University of Science and Technology, Sana'a, Yemen. ghallab@ust.edu.ye.
Hafiz Shahzar Riaz Khan TareenDepartment of Statistics, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60000, Pakistan.
Sohaib AbdalDepartment of Mathematics, Saveetha School of Engineering, SIMATS Thandalam, Chennai, Tamilnadu, 602105, India.

Funding

King Khalid University RGP2/142/46
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food waste is a major obstacle in managing inequality, optimizing living conditions, and promoting prosperity, specifically among the world's most starving economies. Its influences stretch to preventing food supply; it alters financial maturation, complicates environmental issues decomposition, and incorporates raised food operating expenses. Monitoring food waste is implicitly challenging due to confusion arising from its authenticity, extent, geographic location, and schedule; all factors prevent decision-making procedures. This research proposes Aczel-Alsina operational laws to solve the obstacles and intrinsic uncertainty in a q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft sets (q-ROFSS) structure. Also, two novel Aczel-Alsina aggregation operators (AOs) such as q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft aczel-alsina weighted average (q-ROFSAAWA) and q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft aczel-alsina weighted geometric (q-ROFSAAWG) operators are developed with their desirable properties. These operators encourage more accurate and sustainable consolidation of unsure data in multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) mechanisms. A real-life example highlights the proposed method's feasibility and efficacy in identifying the most optimal food waste treatment technologies (FWTT). The comparative study confirms this methodology's validity, exactitude, and feasibility, clarifying its better accuracy and feasibility as compared to other methods. The outcomes demonstrate that the most effective technique for facilitating food waste treatment in the FWM is incineration.

Indexed as

FoodFuzzy LogicModels, TheoreticalWaste ManagementFood Loss and WasteFood Loss and WasteAczel Alsina aggregation operatorsFood waste treatment techniquesMulti-attribute group decision-makingq-rung orthopair fuzzy soft set

Identifiers

PMID40681625
PMCPMC12274601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.