ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning technology in the classification of glaucoma severity using fundus photographs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates the performance of a machine learning model in classifying glaucoma severity using color fundus photographs. Glaucoma severity grading was based on the Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson (HPA) criteria incorporating the mean deviation value, defective points in the pattern deviation probability map, and defect proximity to the fixation point. The dataset of 2,940 fundus photographs from 1,789 patients was matched with visual field tests and equally classified into three classes: normal, mild-moderate, and severe glaucoma stages. The EfficientNetB7, a convolutional neural network model, was trained on these images using transfer learning and fine-tuning techniques. The model achieved an overall accuracy of 0.871 (95% CI, 0.822-0.919). For normal, mild-moderate, and severe classes, the area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.988, 0.932, and 0.963; sensitivity 0.903, 0.823, and 0.887; and specificity 0.960, 0.911, and 0.936, respectively. Analysis of the confusion matrix revealed the impact of structural-functional relationships in glaucoma on model performance. In conclusion, the EfficientNetB7 demonstrated high accuracy in classifying glaucoma severity based on the HPA criteria using fundus photographs, offering potential for clinical application in glaucoma diagnosis and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.