ArticleScientific reports2025
Data mining and safety analysis of FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors based on the FAERS database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- FGFR1 signaling in rheumatoid arthritis: Mechanisms of bone destruction and therapeutic targeting (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Deciphering the Molecular Landscape of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal: From Biology to Precision Oncology.Cancers · 2026Review
- Multi-target-directed drugs: new additions in 2025 and post-marketing safety surveillance of drugs marketed in 2022-2024.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2026Review
- FGFR Aberrations in Solid Tumors: Mechanistic Insights and Clinical Translation of Targeted Therapies.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fibroblast growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (FGFR-TKIs), including erdafitinib, pemigatinib, and futibatinib, are a promising class of therapies for FGFR-driven cancers. While their efficacy is established in clinical trials, real-world safety data remain limited. This study leveraged post-marketing data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) between the second quarter of 2019 and the third quarter of 2024 to evaluate the safety profiles of FGFR-TKIs through disproportionality analysis. A total of 1,629 reports were included (erdafitinib: 982, pemigatinib: 558, futibatinib: 89). The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) belonged to general disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. Notably, several novel AEs not previously identified in clinical trials or drug labels were detected, including corneal thinning associated with erdafitinib, fluid intake reduced with pemigatinib, and blood magnesium decreased with futibatinib. Time-to-onset analysis revealed that delayed median AE onset for erdafitinib (56.5 days) compared to pemigatinib (29 days) and futibatinib (25 days), although all exhibited early failure-type patterns. Subgroup analysis indicated an increased risk of death in futibatinib-treated patients aged < 65 years. These findings offer critical insights beyond clinical trials, informing oncologists of emerging safety concerns associated with FGFR-TKIs in real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.