ArticleScientific reports2025
Adherence to different types of sports shapes motor competence development in preschool children.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A new potential intervention strategy to promote the "body-mind-brain" health development of Chinese children and adolescents: a scoping review.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Pooled it
- Motor engagement, physical activity intensity, and enjoyment in pre-school children during different game-based formats.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the longitudinal effects of participation in different categories of sports on the stability, locomotor, and manipulative motor competence domains of children. This study used a prospective cohort design involving 124 participants, including 68 boys and 56 girls, all 6 years old. The study spanned 6 months, with assessments conducted at three time points: baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The assessments were conducted using the Motor Competence Assessment (MCA) battery, which includes six tests designed to evaluate motor competence across three domains: stability, locomotor, and manipulative skills. Participants were categorized as a cohort based on their regular extracurricular physical activity, specifically in sports classified into four categories: target games, striking/fielding games, net/wall games, and invasion games. A mixed ANOVA was conducted to compare the groups across the three assessment time points for statistical analysis. No significant differences were observed at baseline between groups in the locomotor (p = 0.917; ES = 0.008) or manipulative (p = 0.914; ES = 0.008) domains, but significant differences were found after 3-months (p = 0.045; ES = 0.078), and after 6-months (p < 0.001; ES = 0.209) respectively. No significant differences were noted in the stability domain at any time period (p > 0.05). In conclusion, children engaged in striking/fielding and invasion games demonstrated significant improvements in manipulative and locomotor skills over six months. Specifically, invasion games enhanced locomotor skills, while striking/fielding games improved manipulative skills. These findings highlight the positive and specific impact of diverse sports experiences on motor skill development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.