Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40681562›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Automated seafood freshness detection and preservation analysis using machine learning and paper-based pH sensors.

B Kumaravel, A L Amutha, T P Milintha Mary, Aryan Agrawal, Akshat Singh, S Saran, Nagamaniammai Govindarajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Size-Related Quality Characteristics of Cage-Reared Butter Catfish (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

B KumaravelDepartment of Food Process Engineering, School of Bioengineering, College of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamilnadu, 603203, India.
A L AmuthaDepartment of Computational Intelligence, School of Computing, College of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamilnadu, 603203, India.
T P Milintha MaryDepartment of Food Process Engineering, School of Bioengineering, College of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamilnadu, 603203, India.
Aryan AgrawalDepartment of Computational Intelligence, School of Computing, College of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamilnadu, 603203, India.
Akshat SinghDepartment of Computational Intelligence, School of Computing, College of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamilnadu, 603203, India.
S SaranDepartment of Food Process Engineering, School of Bioengineering, College of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamilnadu, 603203, India.
Nagamaniammai GovindarajanDepartment of Food Process Engineering, School of Bioengineering, College of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamilnadu, 603203, India. nagamaniammai@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seafood, including fish, prawns and various marine products, is a critical component of global nutrition due to its high protein content, essential fatty acids, vitamins and minerals. Traditional methods for assessing seafood freshness such as sensory evaluation and microbiological analysis are labor-intensive, time-consuming and often require specialized equipment. To address these limitations, this research presents an automated freshness detection system for refrigerated fish using machine learning and evaluates the effectiveness of different packaging techniques. Six seafood varieties: Mackerel, Sardine, Prawn, Pomfret, Red Snapper and Cuttlefish were stored under refrigeration and packaged using three methods: vacuum, shrink, and normal packaging. A paper-based pH sensor integrated with Methyl Red and Bromocresol Purple was utilized as a freshness indicator. This sensor effectively monitored spoilage by capturing L*, a*, and b* color values over time. Key parameters, including protein content, lipid content, and Total Volatile Basic Nitrogen (TVB-N) levels, were measured throughout the storage period to assess changes in fish quality. These measurements were used to train a Random Forest (RF) model, aimed at accurately predicting the pH values of the samples. The model's performance was evaluated using standard metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). Among the tested varieties, Pomfret and Mackerel displayed the lowest MSE values (0.004625 and 0.005034, respectively), indicating high predictive reliability. The RMSE values, representing average prediction error magnitude, were also minimal for Pomfret (0.068007) and Mackerel (0.070949). Furthermore, MAE values confirmed robust predictions, with Pomfret (0.065833) and Mackerel (0.062933) achieving the least deviation from actual measurements. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of the paper-based pH sensor as a visual indicator of spoilage, while the RF-based prediction model offers a reliable method for ensuring food safety and quality during cold-chain storage. Integrating sensor-based monitoring with advanced packaging presents a viable solution for extending the shelf life of seafood and enhancing consumer safety.

Indexed as

Food PackagingFood PreservationMachine LearningSeafoodAnimalsFishesFood QualityFood StorageHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationPaperFish qualityFood process automationFreshness indicatorPaper sensorRefrigerated storageSeafood

Identifiers

PMID40681562
PMCPMC12274337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.