ArticleScientific reports2025
Healthcare workers knowledge attitudes and practices regarding labor analgesia in Shaanxi Province China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Awareness of labor analgesia among healthcare workers (HCWs) may be suboptimal. To evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of HCWs regarding labor analgesia. This cross-sectional study enrolled HCWs (obstetricians, anesthesiologists, midwives, and nurses) at hospitals in Shaanxi Province (October 2022 to December 2022). The questionnaires designed for the HCWs contained four dimensions (demographic information, knowledge, attitude, and practice). Factors associated with dimension scores were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The analysis included 402 HCWs. The average knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 7.3 ± 1.1 points (possible range, 0-9 points), 33.0 ± 4.7 points (possible range, 8-40 points), and 11.8 ± 2.7 points (possible range, 3-15 points), respectively, for the HCWs. Specific deficits in knowledge, attitudes, and practices were identified for the HCWs. Factors independently associated with higher knowledge scores and higher attitude scores for HCWs included working as an anesthetist and working in an institution offering labor analgesia (P < 0.05). Attitude scores > 70% of the maximum and working in an institution with a standardized labor analgesia protocol were associated with a higher practice score for HCWs (P < 0.05). These findings may facilitate the design of targeted education/training programs to raise awareness about labor analgesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.