ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating sport persistence through the development of the Sport Persistence Questionnaire.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors influencing sport persistence still represent a knowledge gap - the experience of a systematic review.BMC psychology · 2024Pooled it
- The Role of Social Support and Perfectionist Climate in the Development of Sports Persistence.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regarding sporting activity, one of the most important indicators of effectiveness may be sport persistence, a complex concept, a terminology referring to the mastery, form, level and efficacy of sporting activity. It encompasses our attempts concerning the performance plateau, failures, injuries, or even the resolution, processing and utilisation of stressful situations associated with success and positive events, combining the physical, mental and social aspects of sport. In our study, we aimed to describe the development of a tool to measure sport persistence. Accordingly, our research involved a multi-step process. Based on the experience of a preliminary research [N = 1165], a sport persistence principal component was created including four items, which was a reliable but not nuanced variable. To provide a nuanced picture of sport persistence, a 95-item long questionnaire was developed and tested during the pre-test [N = 1105], which was revised and analysed during the post-test [N = 212]). The results of both the pre-testing and post-testing phases indicated that the 13-item Sport Persistence Questionnaire (SPQ) instrument, which scores items on a five-point Likert scale, is reliable for measuring sport persistence (Cronbach's α = 0.943). The indicators of the model fit were also found to be adequate. The instrument measures the level of sport persistence in one dimension. In conclusion, the findings of this study may be useful concerning tailored interventions in fostering sport persistence, applicable for coaches, educators and policymakers as well. The instrument provides a sound basis for further research. In the future, the investigation of sport persistence of competitive and recreational youth athletes will be available to detect the characteristics of sport persistence, including the qualitative, quantitative and longitudinal analysis of individual, micro, meso-, exo- and macro-level factors influencing sport persistence and intervention programs supporting persistent sporting behaviour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.