ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2025
Heterogeneity in associations between food insecurity and diabetes outcomes.
Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparing Care Coordination and Food Assistance Referrals to Improve Diabetes Outcomes: A Cohort Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFood insecurity is associated with worse diabetes outcomes, but how that association may vary across individuals is unclear. We sought to better understand possible heterogeneity in the association between food insecurity and diabetes outcomes.
methodsLongitudinal cohort study of adults with type 2 diabetes assessed for food insecurity in community-based health centres. Diabetes outcomes were haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), 12 months after food insecurity assessment. We used three machine learning methods (generalised random forest (GRF), X-Learner and Doubly Robust Learner) to assess outcome heterogeneity across the following variables: age, sex, race and ethnicity, health insurance, income, comorbidity, baseline outcome and social vulnerability index.
resultsAmong 41 581 individuals (mean age 56.2 (SD: 12.8) years, 56.9% female), mean baseline HbA1c was 7.8% (SD: 1.9%) and 10 399 (25.0%) reported food insecurity. Food insecurity was associated with 0.1% greater HbA1c at 12 months, with little heterogeneity. For example, using GRF, the mean difference in HbA1c in the quartile with the lowest estimated HbA1c difference associated with experiencing, versus not experiencing, food insecurity was 0.0%, while the mean difference in the quartile with the greatest estimated difference was 0.2%. Results were similar for other outcomes, except that there was no association between food insecurity and LDL.
conclusionsIn this study, we did not observe meaningful heterogeneity in the associations between food insecurity and diabetes outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.