Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40681210›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2025

Cardiac adverse events associated with remdesivir in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Chengliang Yang, Linda Lapp, Alain Amstutz, Matthias Briel, Casey P Shannon, Hedi Zhao, Estefania Espin, Sara Assadian, Mustafa Toma, Scott J Tebbutt

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chengliang Yang *Prevention of Organ Failure (PROOF) Centre of Excellence,Providence Research, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5182-4494
Linda Lapp *Prevention of Organ Failure (PROOF) Centre of Excellence,Providence Research, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3743-434X
Alain AmstutzCLEAR Methods Center, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1716-993X
Matthias BrielCLEAR Methods Center, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2070-5230
Casey P ShannonPrevention of Organ Failure (PROOF) Centre of Excellence,Providence Research, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Hedi ZhaoDepartment of Surgery, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Estefania EspinPrevention of Organ Failure (PROOF) Centre of Excellence,Providence Research, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sara AssadianPrevention of Organ Failure (PROOF) Centre of Excellence,Providence Research, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Mustafa TomaDivision of Cardiology, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Scott J TebbuttPrevention of Organ Failure (PROOF) Centre of Excellence,Providence Research, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada scott.tebbutt@hli.ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7908-1581

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate whether remdesivir is associated with cardiac adverse events (CAEs), addressing concerns raised by basic experiments, clinical case reports and observational studies.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and Embase, searched from January 2020 to December 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing remdesivir with placebo or standard care in patients with COVID-19, with a primary focus on cardiac safety. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included RCTs that evaluated the safety of remdesivir in patients with COVID-19 . Eligible studies were those that compared remdesivir with placebo or standard care in adult patientsCOVID-19 . Inclusion criteria emphasised safety outcomes, particularly CAEs, as primary endpoints. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-Harms guidelines. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. A random-effects model was used for data synthesis. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was applied to assess the certainty of evidence. The primary outcome was the incidence of any CAEs, defined as a composite of all reported cardiac-related harms. Secondary outcomes included specific CAEs such as arrhythmias, heart failure and myocardial disorders.

resultsWe identified 1698 studies, of which seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 4566 participants. The RoB was assessed across multiple domains, with four RCTs showing low risk and three showing moderate risk in specific areas. Pooled analysis revealed no significant association between remdesivir use and CAEs (RR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.04, p=0.118). Subgroup analyses showed consistent findings across different patient demographics and comorbidities. GRADE assessment indicated moderate certainty for overall CAEs, low certainty for arrhythmias and heart failure (due to imprecision and study-level bias), and very low certainty for myocardial disorders (due to small sample size and indirectness).

conclusionsContrary to preliminary concerns and case reports, our meta-analysis found no evidence of a statistically significant association between remdesivir and CAEs among patients with COVID-19 . These findings provide reassurance to clinicians regarding the safety profile of remdesivir in this patient population, supporting its use as an antiviral therapy in the treatment of COVID-19. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and to clarify whether remdesivir may have a neutral or potentially protective effect on cardiac outcomes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022383647.

Indexed as

Adenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentHeart DiseasesCOVID-19HumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2Adenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsremdesivirAdverse eventsCOVID-19Meta-AnalysisSafetySARS-CoV-2 InfectionSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID40681210
PMCPMC12273096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.